Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 53
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Trends Biotechnol ; 38(5): 465-467, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32302577

RESUMO

We discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and lay the groundwork for international coherence. In this third of three articles, we focus on labeling and coexistence as well as discuss the political reality and potential ways forward.


Assuntos
Biotecnologia/ética , Tomada de Decisões/ética , União Europeia , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/genética , Biotecnologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados , Humanos , Medição de Risco/legislação & jurisprudência
5.
Trends Biotechnol ; 38(4): 349-351, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32171418

RESUMO

Here, we discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, to make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and to lay the groundwork for international coherence. We discussed the scope and definitions in a previous article and, thus, here we focus on the procedures for risk assessment and risk management.


Assuntos
Agricultura/legislação & jurisprudência , Biotecnologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Organismos Geneticamente Modificados , Animais , Meio Ambiente , União Europeia , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Plantas , Medição de Risco/legislação & jurisprudência , Gestão de Riscos/legislação & jurisprudência
6.
Trends Biotechnol ; 38(3): 231-234, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32059122

RESUMO

We discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organisms (GMO) regulatory framework, make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and lay the groundwork for international coherence. The first in a three-part series, this article focuses on reform options related to the scope of the legislation and the GMO definition.


Assuntos
Produtos Agrícolas/genética , Edição de Genes/legislação & jurisprudência , Organismos Geneticamente Modificados , União Europeia , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados , Melhoramento Vegetal/legislação & jurisprudência , Melhoramento Vegetal/métodos , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas
7.
Transgenic Res ; 28(3-4): 411-417, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31098823

RESUMO

In this short communication, we report that the cell cycle checkpoint genes At-CycD2 and At-CDC27a from Arabidopsis thaliana enhance the transient heterologous protein expression in Nicotiana benthamiana. We selected a well-studied and widely used virus expression vector based on TMV for the delivery of recombinant proteins into the host plant. Co-infiltration of TMV-gfp and binary expression vectors carrying the At-CycD2 and At-CDC27a genes, respectively, resulted in enhanced GFP fluorescence in agroinoculated leaves. These findings corresponded with the observation of (1) higher mRNA levels for TMV and gfp and (2) increased GFP protein accumulation. Furthermore, by co-delivery of the TMV-scFv-TM43-E10 and At-CycD2/At-CDC27a expressing constructs we observed an enhanced amount of the scFv-TM43-E10 antibody fragment compared to the delivery of the TMV-scFv-TM43-E10 alone. We anticipate that this finding might be adapted for enhancing foreign protein production in N. benthamiana as the host plant.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Arabidopsis/metabolismo , Arabidopsis/metabolismo , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/metabolismo , Vetores Genéticos/administração & dosagem , Folhas de Planta/metabolismo , Vírus do Mosaico do Tabaco/genética , Arabidopsis/genética , Proteínas de Arabidopsis/genética , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/genética , Proteínas de Fluorescência Verde/genética , Proteínas de Fluorescência Verde/metabolismo , Folhas de Planta/genética , Transgenes/fisiologia
9.
Annu Rev Plant Biol ; 70: 699-726, 2019 04 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30822113

RESUMO

This review describes the current status and future challenges of risk assessment and regulation of plants modified by modern biotechniques, namely genetic engineering and genome editing. It provides a general overview of the biosafety and regulation of genetically modified plants and details different regulatory frameworks with a focus on the European situation. The environmental risk and safety assessment of genetically modified plants is explained, and aspects of toxicological assessments are discussed, especially the controversial debate in Europe on the added scientific value of untargeted animal feeding studies. Because RNA interference (RNAi) is increasingly explored for commercial applications, the risk and safety assessment of RNAi-based genetically modified plants is also elucidated. The production, detection, and identification of genome-edited plants are described. Recent applications of modern biotechniques, namely synthetic biology and gene drives, are discussed, and a short outlook on the future follows.


Assuntos
Edição de Genes , Animais , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas , Medição de Risco
10.
Arch Toxicol ; 93(4): 1095-1139, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30756133

RESUMO

In 2012, a controversial study on the long-term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and the glyphosate-tolerant genetically modified (GM) maize NK603 was published. The EC-funded G-TwYST research consortium tested the potential subchronic and chronic toxicity as well as the carcinogenicity of the glyphosate-resistant genetically modified maize NK603 by performing two 90-day feeding trials, one with GM maize inclusion rates of 11 and 33% and one with inclusion rates of up to 50%, as well as a 2-year feeding trial with inclusion rates of 11 and 33% in male and female Wistar Han RCC rats by taking into account OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals and EFSA recommendations on the safety testing of whole-food/feed in laboratory animals. In all three trials, the NK603 maize, untreated and treated once with Roundup during its cultivation, and the conventional counterpart were tested. Differences between each test group and the control group were evaluated. Equivalence was assessed by comparing the observed difference to differences between non-GM reference groups in previous studies. In case of significant differences, whether the effects were dose-related and/or accompanied by changes in related parameters including histopathological findings was evaluated. It is concluded that no adverse effects related to the feeding of the NK603 maize cultivated with or without Roundup for up to 2 years were observed. Based on the outcome of the subchronic and combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity studies, recommendations on the scientific justification and added value of long-term feeding trials in the GM plant risk assessment process are presented.


Assuntos
Ração Animal/normas , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Herbicidas/toxicidade , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/efeitos dos fármacos , Zea mays , Animais , Testes de Carcinogenicidade , Resistência a Medicamentos/genética , Feminino , Glicina/toxicidade , Masculino , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/genética , Ratos Wistar , Testes de Toxicidade Crônica , Testes de Toxicidade Subcrônica , Zea mays/efeitos dos fármacos , Zea mays/genética
11.
Curr Med Chem ; 26(3): 365-380, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28721831

RESUMO

During the last two decades, the production of pharmaceutical proteins in plants evolved from proof of concept to established technology adopted by several biotechnological companies. This progress is particularly based on intensive research starting stable genetic transformation and moving to transient expression. Due to its advantages in yield and speed of protein production transient expression platforms became the leading plant-based manufacturing technology. Current transient expression methods rely on Agrobacteriummediated delivery of expression vectors into plant cells. In recent years, great advances have been made in the improvement of expression vectors, host cell engineering as well as in the development of commercial manufacturing processes. Several GMP-certified large-scale production facilities exist around the world to utilize agroinfiltration method. A number of pharmaceutical proteins produced by transient expression are currently in clinical development. The great potential of transient expression platform in respect to rapid response to emerging pandemics was demonstrated by the production of experimental ZMapp antibodies against Ebola virus as well as influenza vaccines. This review is focused on current design, status and future perspectives of plant transient expression system for the production of biopharmaceutical proteins.


Assuntos
Evolução Molecular , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Planticorpos/metabolismo , Plantas/genética , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/genética , Anticorpos Monoclonais/biossíntese , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Ebolavirus/imunologia , Engenharia Genética , Vetores Genéticos , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/terapia , Humanos , Planticorpos/genética , Planticorpos/uso terapêutico
12.
Arch Toxicol ; 92(7): 2385-2399, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29855658

RESUMO

The genetically modified maize event MON810 expresses a Bacillus thuringiensis-derived gene, which encodes the insecticidal protein Cry1Ab to control some lepidopteran insect pests such as the European corn borer. It has been claimed that the immune system may be affected following the oral/intragastric administration of the MON810 maize in various different animal species. In the frame of the EU-funded project GRACE, two 90-day feeding trials, the so-called studies D and E, were performed to analyze the humoral and cellular immune responses of male and female Wistar Han RCC rats fed the MON810 maize. A MON810 maize variety of Monsanto was used in the study D and a MON810 maize variety of Pioneer Hi-Bred was used in the study E. The total as well as the maize protein- and Cry1Ab-serum-specific IgG, IgM, IgA and IgE levels, the proliferative activity of the lymphocytes, the phagocytic activity of the granulocytes and monocytes, the respiratory burst of the phagocytes, a phenotypic analysis of spleen, thymus and lymph node cells as well as the in vitro production of cytokines by spleen cells were analyzed. No specific Cry1Ab immune response was observed in MON810 rats, and anti-maize protein antibody responses were similar in MON810 and control rats. Single parameters were sporadically altered in rats fed the MON810 maize when compared to control rats, but these alterations are considered to be of no immunotoxicological significance.


Assuntos
Ração Animal/toxicidade , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados/toxicidade , Imunidade Celular , Imunidade Humoral , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/toxicidade , Zea mays/genética , Ração Animal/normas , Animais , Toxinas de Bacillus thuringiensis , Proteínas de Bactérias/imunologia , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Endotoxinas/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados/normas , Proteínas Hemolisinas/imunologia , Imunoglobulinas/sangue , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/imunologia , Ratos Wistar , Testes de Toxicidade Crônica
14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30701172

RESUMO

The ability to successfully exploit genome edited organisms for the benefit of food security and the environment will essentially be determined by the extent to which these organisms fall under specific regulatory provisions. In many jurisdictions the answer to this question is considered to depend on the genetic characteristics of the edited organism, and whether the changes introduced in its genome do (or do not) occur naturally. We provide here a number of key considerations to assist with this evaluation as well as a guide of concrete examples of genetic alterations with an assessment of their natural occurrence. These examples support the conclusion that for many of the common types of alterations introduced by means of genome editing, the resulting organisms would not be subject to specific biosafety regulatory provisions whenever novelty of the genetic combination is a crucial determinant.

15.
Methods Mol Biol ; 1642: 151-168, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28815499

RESUMO

In this chapter we present an alternative method to develop marker-free transgenic plants. It makes use of the Cre/loxP recombination system from bacteriophage P1 and consists of two essential components. The first component is the transgenic plant containing a loxP-flanked marker gene. The second component is a cre transient expression vector based on potato virus X. The great benefit of this transient delivery method consists in the avoidance of stable integration of the cre recombinase gene into the plant genome. Upon infection of the loxP-target plant with PVX-Cre, the virus spreads systemically through the plant and causes the recombinase-mediated excision of the marker gene. Marker-free transgenic loci can be transmitted to the progeny by plant regeneration from PVX-Cre systemically infected leaves or self-pollination of virus-infected plants. The protocol covers generation of loxP-target transgenic plants, PVX-mediated delivery of Cre recombinase protein, phenotypic and molecular analysis of recombination events, and transmission of marker-free transgenic loci to the next generation. The transient expression system described in this chapter can be adapted for marker gene removal in other plant species that are amenable for virus infection.


Assuntos
Engenharia Genética/métodos , Vetores Genéticos/metabolismo , Integrases/genética , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas , Potexvirus/genética , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/genética , Agrobacterium tumefaciens/metabolismo , Escherichia coli/genética , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Expressão Gênica , Genes Reporter , Marcadores Genéticos , Vetores Genéticos/química , Germinação/genética , Proteínas de Fluorescência Verde/genética , Proteínas de Fluorescência Verde/metabolismo , Integrases/metabolismo , Folhas de Planta/genética , Folhas de Planta/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Folhas de Planta/metabolismo , Potexvirus/metabolismo , Recombinação Genética , Sementes/genética , Sementes/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Sementes/metabolismo , /metabolismo , Transformação Genética
16.
Environ Sci Eur ; 29(1): 21, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28546900

RESUMO

We respond to the paper of Kruse-Plass et al. (Environ Sci Eur 29:12, 2017), published in this journal, regarding the risk to non-target lepidopteran larvae exposed to pollen from one or more of three Bt maize events (MON810, Bt11 and 1507). We emphasise that what is important for environmental risk assessment is not the number of pollen grains per se, but the degree of exposure of a NT lepidopteran larva to Bt protein contained in maize pollen. The main text of this response deals with general issues which Kruse-Plass et al. have failed to understand; more detailed refutations of each of their claims are given in Additional file 1. Valid environmental risk assessment requires direct measurement of pollen on leaves at varying distances outside a source field(s); such measurements reflect the potential exposure experienced by an individual larva on a host plant. There are no new data in the Kruse-Plass et al. paper, or indeed any data directly quantifying pollen on actual host-plant leaves outside a maize field; only data gathered within or at the edge of maize crops were reported. Values quoted by Kruse-Plass et al. for deposition on host plants outside the field were estimates only. We reiterate the severe methodological criticisms made by EFSA [Relevance of a new scientific publication (Hofmann et al. 2016) for previous environmental risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations on the cultivation of Bt-maize events MON810, Bt11 and 1507. EFSA Supp Publ; EN-1070, 2016], which render this estimation procedure unreliable. Furthermore, criticisms of EFSA (EFSA J 2015(13):4127, 2015) and of EFSA [Relevance of a new scientific publication (Hofmann et al. 2016) for previous environmental risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations on the cultivation of Bt-maize events MON810, Bt11 and 1507. EFSA Supp Publ; EN-1070, 2016] made by Kruse-Plass et al. are shown in Additional file 1 to be without foundation. We therefore consider that there is no valid evidence presented by Kruse-Plass et al. to justify their conclusions.

17.
Arch Toxicol ; 91(4): 1977-2006, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27730258

RESUMO

The data of four 90-day feeding trials and a 1-year feeding trial with the genetically modified (GM) maize MON810 in Wistar Han RCC rats performed in the frame of EU-funded project GRACE were analysed. Firstly, the data obtained from the groups having been fed the non-GM maize diets were combined to establish a historical control data set for Wistar Han RCC rats at the animal housing facility (Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia). The variability of all parameters is described, and the reference values and ranges have been derived. Secondly, the consistency of statistically significant differences found in the five studies was analysed. In order to do so, the body weight development, organ weight, haematology and clinical biochemistry data were compared between the studies. Based on the historical control data, equivalence ranges for these parameters were defined, and the values measured in the GM maize-fed groups were compared with these equivalence ranges. Thirdly, the (statistical) power of these feeding studies with whole food/feed was assessed and detectable toxicologically relevant group differences were derived. Linear mixed models (LMM) were applied, and standardized effect sizes (SES) were calculated in order to compare different parameters as well as to provide an overall picture of group and study differences at a glance. The comparison of the five feeding trials showed a clear study effect in the control data. It also showed inconsistency both in the frequency of statistically significant differences and in the difference values between control and test groups.


Assuntos
Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados/toxicidade , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/toxicidade , Zea mays/genética , Ração Animal , Animais , Peso Corporal , Feminino , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Tamanho do Órgão , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Fatores de Tempo , Testes de Toxicidade/métodos
19.
Arch Toxicol ; 90(10): 2531-62, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27439414

RESUMO

The GRACE (GMO Risk Assessment and Communication of Evidence; www.grace-fp7.eu ) project was funded by the European Commission within the 7th Framework Programme. A key objective of GRACE was to conduct 90-day animal feeding trials, animal studies with an extended time frame as well as analytical, in vitro and in silico studies on genetically modified (GM) maize in order to comparatively evaluate their use in GM plant risk assessment. In the present study, the results of a 1-year feeding trial with a GM maize MON810 variety, its near-isogenic non-GM comparator and an additional conventional maize variety are presented. The feeding trials were performed by taking into account the guidance for such studies published by the EFSA Scientific Committee in 2011 and the OECD Test Guideline 452. The results obtained show that the MON810 maize at a level of up to 33 % in the diet did not induce adverse effects in male and female Wistar Han RCC rats after a chronic exposure.


Assuntos
Ração Animal , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados/toxicidade , Nível de Saúde , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/toxicidade , Zea mays/genética , Ração Animal/normas , Ração Animal/toxicidade , Animais , Feminino , Masculino , Ratos Endogâmicos , Medição de Risco , Testes de Toxicidade Crônica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...